Apply for the Zenith Fellows Award
Apply for the Zenith Fellows Award research grant by submitting your LOI through proposalCENTRAL.
The Alzheimer‘s Association was founded in 1980 by a small group of family members caring for loved ones with Alzheimer‘s disease. These individuals united in disappointment with the quality of information available to them and in dissatisfaction with the lack of medical and social awareness of this devastating condition. Two years after its founding, the fledgling organization funded its first research grant, awarding a total of about $80,000 to a handful of investigators. Since then, the Association has grown into the largest nonprofit funder of Alzheimer’s research. Today, the Alzheimer's Association leads the way to end Alzheimer's and all other dementia — by accelerating global research, driving risk reduction and early detection, and maximizing quality care and support.
As the world’s leading nonprofit funder of Alzheimer’s and all dementia research, the Association is currently investing $300 million in 920 active best-of-field projects in 45 countries, spanning six continents. The Association supplements its own funding efforts with public policy initiatives directed toward increasing Alzheimer’s and all dementia research funding at the federal level. The Association‘s International Research Grant Program has served historically as an incubator for novel ideas, complementing the programs of the National Institute on Aging and the other institutes of the National Institutes of Health as well as other federal agencies around the world. As our funding initiative has grown and matured, grant categories have expanded to support researchers at every stage in their careers. Funded projects now explore the broadest possible spectrum of biological approaches to understanding, preventing and treating Alzheimer’s and all dementia; social and behavioral strategies for ameliorating the effects of dementia on individuals and their families and professional caregivers; clinical studies; and adaptive technologies.
The Zenith Fellows award was initiated in 1991 to provide a vehicle for research support for donors with a substantial personal commitment to the advancement of Alzheimer’s and all other dementia research. The awards are made possible by the generosity of a group of individuals and organizations (Zenith Society) that have each committed $1 million to the Alzheimer’s Association for support of the program.
The objective of the 2022 Zenith Fellows Awards competition is to provide major support for investigators who have:
- Contributed significantly to the dementia science field — Alzheimer’s and all other dementia research,
- Made significant contributions to other areas of science and are now beginning to focus more directly on problems related to Alzheimer’s and all other dementia, and
- Are likely to make substantial contributions in the future.
The proposed research should address fundamental problems related to early detection, etiology, pathogenesis, treatment and/or prevention of Alzheimer’s and all other dementia. The proposed research must be “on the cutting edge” of basic science or biomedical research and thus may not conform to current conventional scientific wisdom or may challenge the prevailing orthodoxy.
Areas of focus
Areas of focus are high-priority research areas in which the Association actively seeks proposals. The areas are defined broadly, and the examples cited are not intended to preclude or constrain other projects or proposals. Potential applicants are strongly encouraged to submit proposals in their own areas of interest or formulate questions different from those presented in this announcement. Innovative and novel ideas to address challenges in research are the core of the Association‘s scientific program. The Association has identified a number of important focus areas within five broad categories: (1) social and behavioral features, (2) clinical investigations, (3) basic biology, (4) adaptive technology, and (5) cognitive functional studies. Zenith proposals are restricted to basic biological studies and clinical investigations (excluding clinical trials).
Central to all of our funding programs, the Alzheimer’s Association is committed to closing the gap on issues that drive health disparities and to increasing diversity within research and clinical trials. Proposals related to basic science and/or clinical trials that will further our understanding of underlying mechanisms that drive health disparities are highly encouraged, as are studies that focus on the inclusion of minority and underrepresented populations. Issues related to disparities and diversity are a top funding priority.
These are bench science projects involving in vitro or animal work pertaining to the causes of dementia; early and accurate detection and diagnosis; animal models; treatments; and prevention. This may also include computation studies, such as mining existing datasets for genes linked to risk or other such studies. Please note that in vitro work involving human samples falls into this category.
Projects in which the majority of data is derived directly from studies involving active participation of human subjects. Examples include the non-clinical studies essential to evaluate potential new therapies; biomarker collection; imaging technology; and risk factors including genetics, cardiovascular issues, diabetes and metabolic factors and lifestyle issues. In vitro projects conducted in human samples should be categorized as basic biology rather than clinical investigations. Note that this definition of clinical investigation does not extend to clinical trials which will not be considered for funding under the Zenith program.
Although vast advances have been made in Alzheimer’s research, the field still faces a great number of serious impediments to progress in translating basic science discoveries into effective treatments and evidence-based clinical practices for dementia. Some of the many challenges that remain for investigators to address include:
Cause(s) of Alzheimer's and other dementias
- How do specific sets of neurons in select brain structures become dysfunctional?
- What causes selective neuronal death in specific brain regions and not in others?
- What factors initiate these processes, and what are key steps in the cascade leading to cell death?
- How do genetics interact with other factors to influence these processes?
- What factors tip the balance between effective removal or accumulation of toxins from the brain?
- How do risk factors interact with one another and how are they associated with the brain changes seen in disease?
The primary neuropathological events in Alzheimer’s and all other dementia involve aberrant formation of pathologic protein species. Advances in molecular biology have provided the tools needed to unravel the mechanisms of synthesis, trafficking and accumulation of these proteins in the brain. Research in this area has begun to produce promising leads about the role of these proteins in neural function, dysfunction, and cell death and to suggest strategies to correct this molecular damage. Although these insights into the neurobiology of the disease have generated a number of ideas, the precise etiology of the disease is still not known. While there are many theories on possible mechanisms of neural dysfunction and/or cell death, critical questions remain unanswered.
None of these theories has been validated by crucial experiments designed to demonstrate the functional relationship(s) between characteristic molecular aberrations and the clinical manifestations of the disease. One of the most difficult challenges for the field is to link the perspectives of investigators inhabiting two totally different worlds: those who view Alzheimer‘s and all other dementia through the prism of molecular/neuropathological events and those who know it through its behavioral and clinical manifestations.
The precise relationships between the clinical symptomatology and the neuropathology of the disease are not well defined. There is a critical need to understand not only the presumptive causal links between the neurobiology and clinical course of the disease but also the mechanisms for the heterogeneity of presentation. These mechanisms may vary widely and may influence differential diagnosis and differences in adverse events/responses to treatments.
Early and accurate detection and diagnosis
- What are the most sensitive, specific and cost-effective diagnostic procedures?
- What are the most sensitive, specific and cost-effective procedures for assessing change through the course of the disease?
Several converging lines of evidence suggest that the neurodegenerative processes associated with dementia begin several years before the first clinical features can be detected with current instruments. Although clinical information can be gleaned from longitudinal studies, even these data are usually obtained in the middle to later stages of the disease when some of the cognitive and behavioral signs appear. As a result, there is little or no information on manifestations of the disease during its earliest preclinical stages or the very earliest behaviors of individuals at risk. These gaps result from the lack of appropriate technologies for non-invasive observation and early detection of the disease. Finding sensitive and specific markers will become even more important as pressure increases to develop very early treatments, especially if these early interventions have the potential for harmful side effects, it is crucial that they be targeted appropriately. Thus, there is an urgent need to find accurate, accessible biological markers of disease that are applicable for all populations. These include imaging techniques and more culturally sensitive cognitive and behavioral assessment instruments.
Well-tested biological markers for Alzheimer’s and all other dementia are not the only critical need—investigators are also encouraged to explore the observational and subjective perspective that family members, care providers and people with the illness can provide about the very earliest events. The observations of family members, nurses, social workers and other care providers have already provided some important insights about early cognitive and behavioral events.
- What are the most effective and safe pharmacological treatment strategies, behavioral management techniques and combinations of therapies?
Research on interventions is poised for a revolution and we must leave no stone left unturned. Dramatic advances in understanding the neurobiology of Alzheimer’s—including elucidation of many genetic and molecular mechanisms involved in the disease—have provided numerous promising leads for drug development. It is now generally agreed that the most critical neurobiological events underlying the behavioral problems and clinical manifestations of the disease concern dysfunctions in nerve cell signal transduction, loss of synapses, and premature cell death. Until recently, strategies for developing interventions focused primarily on symptomatic treatments for middle and late stages of the disease. It is anticipated that as new therapeutic targets are discovered, it will be possible to improve the quality of signal transduction and the ability of nerve cells to communicate. As even more is learned about the neurobiology of Alzheimer‘s and all other dementia, there will be greater reliance on techniques to design specific molecules aimed at correcting a particular cellular dysfunction. Some important therapeutic approaches should involve the discovery of interventions aimed at preventing premature cell death and restoring or prolonging the function of surviving damaged nerve cells. Clinical trials (phase 1-3) are not appropriate for the Zenith mechanism, but non-clinical drug discovery and development work would fit within the overall program remit.
Reduced risk and prevention
- What are the prospects and strategies for reduced risk or prevention?
One of the most important priorities is research on strategies to reduce risk or prevent Alzheimer’s and all other dementia. This is rooted in the severe effects of the diseases on individuals and their families, the very large number of people with the illnesses and the anticipated growth of these numbers with the aging of populations around the world – especially in lower and middle-income countries. Developing effective accessible, sustainable strategies will bring significant benefit in reducing the economic and social costs, preserving the economic productivity of those who are or will be family caregivers, and lessening the impact on the health care system. Research into basic disease mechanisms can have immense benefit for development of strategies to reduce risk or improve prevention, but there is not always a tight link between understanding the mechanisms of a disease and preventing it. In fact, highly successful prevention efforts have been designed and conducted under circumstances in which disease mechanisms were understood poorly, or not at all.
- What are the characteristics, either genetic or acquired, that increase the risk of Alzheimer’s and all other dementia or, conversely, offer protection against disease or delay its onset?
- How do the risk factors vary among specific diverse populations?
- Which risk factors are modifiable, and when in life does intervention have greatest impact?
Epidemiological studies reveal growing evidence that most cases of Alzheimer’s and all other dementia likely involve a combination of genetic and environmental risk factors, with some population being disproportionately affected. Identifying and validating these risk factors, across various groups remains one of the most critical scientific challenges. For instance, the potential link between cerebral blood vessel disease and Alzheimer’s is one promising area of research. The broader implication is the hypothesis that systemic vascular factors are risk factors for developing Alzheimer’s and all other dementia. This risk encompasses different forms of cardiovascular disease, including coronary artery disease, carotid atherosclerosis, history of hypertension or high cholesterol, Type II diabetes and stroke or transient ischemic attacks.
Funding and award period
We anticipate funding up to three Zenith Fellows Awards. Each award is limited to $450,000 total funding (direct and indirect costs) over a period of up to three years. Requests in any given year may not exceed $250,000 (direct and indirect costs). Additional details on allowable costs are outlined in the budget
- Letter of Intent Launch: Dec. 15, 2021
- Letter of Intent Deadline*: Feb. 8, 2022, 5 p.m. (EST)
- Application Deadline*: March 25, 2022, 5 p.m. (EST)
- Application Review: April–June 2022
- Award Notifications: Aug. 15, 2022
*The Letter of Intent and application must be received by 5 p.m. EASTERN STANDARD TIME on their respective deadlines.
They will not be accepted after these dates — no exceptions will be made. Hard copies or emails will not be accepted.
Only established independent investigators are eligible as evidenced by:
- Academic appointment.
- Major, peer-reviewed, external multi-year grant support on which the applicant is the principal investigator (PI).
- Independent laboratory operation.
- Quality and independence of publication record.
Only applicants who have already contributed significantly to the field of Alzheimer’s and all other dementia research and/or have the clear likelihood of making significant contributions will be seriously considered. The Alzheimer’s Association recognizes the need to increase the number of scientists from underrepresented groups in the research enterprise. Researchers from these groups are encouraged to apply.
The Alzheimer’s Association recognizes the need to increase the number of scientists from underrepresented groups in the research enterprise, including women scientists. Researchers from these groups are encouraged to apply.
In general, scientists and clinicians from public, private, domestic and foreign research laboratories, medical centers, hospitals and universities are eligible to apply. State and federal government-appropriated laboratories in the U.S. and abroad and for-profit organizations are prohibited from serving as the applicant institution. However, state and federal government scientists can participate as collaborating scientists with research teams from other eligible applicant institutions.
For US entities, the Letter of Intent (LOI) materials will include proof of your organization‘s not-for-profit status and a W9 signed and dated by the signing official. Non-US entities must provide a W8 signed and dated by the signing official.
Your LOI will not be accepted without these documents (IRS Letter of Determination is no longer accepted). For non-profit organizations (non-academic), additional documentation may be required to confirm your organization has segregation of duties between transaction execution and transaction utilization.
The Alzheimer’s Association reserves the right to request additional documentation and/or materials to verify an applicant’s status should any of the eligibility requirements be unconfirmed.
- Previous recipients of Zenith Fellows Awards are ineligible.
- Overlapping funding of more than one Alzheimer's Association grant is not allowed. Investigators who currently have an active Association grant may apply for another award in the last year of their grant if that last year concludes by June 30 before the start of the new funding year on July 1. There are some exceptions; please contact email@example.com if you have questions regarding your eligibility.
- Investigators delinquent in reporting: The Alzheimer's Association will not accept new grant applications from currently funded investigators who are delinquent in submitting required reports and other deliverables on active grants. Investigators that have previous Alzheimer’s Association awards closed as ‘Incomplete’ are not eligible to apply without exception. This policy will be strictly adhered to with no exceptions.
- Current members of the Association's Medical and Scientific Advisory Group (MSAG) and the International Research Grant Program (IRGP) Council are ineligible to (a) compete for any research grant or (b) be included as co-investigator or to receive any financial benefit from an application. These individuals may be listed as key personnel/collaborator to an application and will be recused from participating in their peer-review.
Budget summary” for the proposed research project is required and must be submitted with the application and within the allowable two-page limit. However, if the application is to be awarded, a more detailed budget will be required and must be approved before the disbursement of funds. Your budget must not exceed the maximum amount of the award, $450,000 total or up to $250,000 in any given year. You cannot request the award for one year
(minimum two years — award cannot be for only one year).
It is required that most of the funds awarded under this program be used for direct research support. No more than 10% of the total award may be included as indirect costs, this is inclusive of indirect costs for the implementing institution as well as any to subcontracts.
Allowable costs under this award
- Purchase and care of laboratory animals.
- Small pieces of laboratory equipment and laboratory supplies (purchases over $10,000 require prior approval, even if included in the project proposal budget).
- Computer software if used strictly for data collection.
- Salary for the principal investigator, scientific (including postdoctoral fellows) and technical staff (including laboratory technicians and modest administrative support).
- Research supplies needed for the proposed studies.
- Support for travel to scientific and professional meetings, not to exceed $1,000 in any given year.
Not allowable as Direct Costs under this award
- Computer hardware or standard software (e.g., Microsoft Office).
- Construction or renovation costs.
- Rent for laboratory/office space.
- Salary and/or compensation for Alzheimer’s Association Staff or current members of the Alzheimer’s Association Medical and Scientific Advisory Group (MSAG) and the International Research Grant Program (IRGP) Council. A complete list of MSAG and IRGP Council members can be found on our website.
Proposal submission procedures
1: Letter of intent submission
The first step in applying to the Alzheimer's Association for any research grant is to create and submit a Letter of Intent (LOI) through the online application system at http://proposalcentral.com
. Applications will not be accepted without an approved LOI. First-time users must register and fill out a Professional Profile to begin the LOI/application process. The LOI and completed application must be submitted by a single Principal Investigator (PI). Applicants must submit an LOI for the current active cycle that they are interested in, NO EXCEPTIONS. All LOIs must be approved or rejected in the current grant cycle. Hard copies or emails of the LOI will not be accepted. The purpose of the LOI is to ensure that all applicants are eligible for the competition they are applying to and to assist Association staff in planning for peer reviews. LOIs will not be accepted after the deadline date. No exceptions will be made. The applicant is responsible for adhering to the space limitations (described below) and any decision regarding moving an LOI forward will be evaluated based on the submitted information.
The Letter of Intent (LOI) is completed through the online interactive system. Applicants must complete the required tabs and upload any required documents. Some of these required fields are described below:
- Name of the principal investigator.
- Contact information for the principal investigator.
- Lead Institution — applicant must be a full-time employee at time of submission (institution/organization name must be in English).
- List your current academic rank/position at the time of submission, do not list pending promotions.
- Proposal title.
- Area of focus of the submission, such as diverse populations, social and behavioral, or biological (options will be available to choose from within the system).
- Brief project description, including methodology, specific aims of the project, innovation/novelty of the project, and the impact on Alzheimer’s and all other dementia field are required. Each section is limited to 1,000 characters including spaces, and it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure space limit is adhered.
- Employer (institution) Identification Number (EIN) — must match the EIN listed in the non-profit documentation.
- All applicants must include an ORCID ID. This is a required field, you will not be able to submit your LOI without this information.
- Provide a W9 signed and dated by the Signing Official for US entities. For non-US entities provide a W8 signed and dated by the signing official. This document should not contain the applicant’s information.
- Biosketch is required for the primary applicant only. Additional biosketches can be included at the full application stage.
- Budget details are not required at the LOI stage.
- Additional attachments not specifically outlined above are not allowed and will be removed.
Each LOI is evaluated by the Alzheimer’s Association and a select panel of experts to decide whether to triage or invite a full proposal, with special attention given to:
- Demonstrable innovation/novelty of the proposed project (especially in the context of the PI's recently funded work).
- Alignment with the research priorities of the Alzheimer’s Association.
- Impact of project on Alzheimer’s and all other dementia.
- Evidence of methodological rigor that address the research question(s) being proposed.
- Past and potential future contributions of the investigator to advance Alzheimer’s and all other dementia research.
Note: Due to the high volume of submitted Letters of Intent, specific feedback and reviewer comments are not provided at the LOI stage.
The Alzheimer’s Association requires that all applicants be registered as a reviewer with the Association in order to submit a Letter of Intent. If you submit a Letter of Intent/application and are NOT currently registered as a reviewer, you will be automatically added to the Alzheimer’s Association reviewer roster. As a requirement to submitting an LOI/application, you agree to review at least one grant proposal within your area of expertise in one of the other granting mechanisms outside of the specific grant program to which you are applying.
2: Full application submission
If you are invited to submit a full application, the required materials including the application format, templates, and instructions, will be available online at proposalCENTRAL after your LOI has been approved in the system. The full application must consist of the following documents:
If you are invited to submit a full application, the required materials including the application format, templates, and instructions, will be available online at proposalCENTRAL after your LOI has been approved in the system. The full application must consist of the following documents:
1. Problem Statement (1 page).
2. Work Plan (5 pages).
3. Recruitment Plan (1 page) – If applicable.
4. Available Resources & Budget Justification (2 pages).
5. Biosketch(es) – PI/Co-PI/Key personnel – limited to 5 pages each.
6. W9 signed and dated by the signing official for U.S. entities. For non-U.S. entities, a W8 signed and dated by the signing official.
7. Plan for Data Sharing (1 page).
8. Resubmission (1 page) – All resubmissions have the opportunity, if they wish, to provide a one-page summary addressing comments raised by reviewers in a prior review cycle(s).
9. References (1 page) – Use the reference style that is most common in the major journal(s) for your discipline, specialty or sub-specialty.
Applications will be reviewed by Alzheimer’s Association and a select panel of experts with special attention to:
- Significance of the question being studied.
- Applicant information.
- Quality of the work plan.
- Quality and adequacy of available resources and budget.
- Impact-Risk of the proposal and how it will add to the field’s overall knowledge and advancement.
- Response to prior review (if applicable).
The PI who submits the application must be the same PI who submitted the approved LOI. An LOI submitted on behalf of another applicant or by an administrator will result in a rejected LOI. Once the applicant enters the application system, on-screen instructions will be provided to complete the application process. The application does not need to be completed in one session; a partially completed application can be saved and completed at any time before the deadline.
It is imperative that you proofread your application before submission; you will not be allowed to make any changes to the application after the deadline or once applications are under review.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure and verify that:
1. The application is submitted by the receipt date/time deadline. Once submitted, you will receive a confirmation email from proposalCENTRAL that your application was successfully submitted. If you do not receive a confirmation, click the Proposals tab and under the “Status” column make sure it says Submitted and not In Progress which indicates you have not yet submitted your application.
2. The application is complete and accurate before submission. Only a single copy of an application will be accepted. Signatures are not required at the time of submission, the signature page provided is for use should your institution/organization require signatures; we do not override any institutional policies and/or procedures. Please do not submit the signature page with your application.
3. Revisions, additional materials, letters of collaboration/support and/or reference, manuscripts, appendices, etc., are not allowed and if attached, will be removed from your application.
Ethical/regulatory approvals and reporting requirements
If awarded for funding, the Alzheimer’s Association requires that any necessary ethical and/or regulatory approvals are kept current and also requires specific reporting throughout the lifetime of the award. This includes, but is not limited to, the following:
Animal and human subject assurances, and/or rDNA certification
Animal welfare and human subject assurances are not required at the time of application. Investigators have up to 90 days after receipt of their award notification to submit these documents. However, the Alzheimer’s Association encourages investigators to initiate their certification applications on a schedule that recognizes that rDNA certification, IRB/IACUC approval at many institutions can take more than 90 days. The Association accepts only certifications that apply specifically to the funded project and must include the name of the awardee. An award letter will not be issued unless the appropriate certifications are in place and include the name of the awardee within the 90 days from award notification.
Annual scientific and financial reports
Interim Scientific & Financial Reports must be submitted at the end of each reporting period as long as the grant remains active. Final Scientific & Financial Reports must be filed within 90 days of the grant‘s end date. All reports must be submitted electronically via proposalCENTRAL. The Financial Report must be approved and signed by someone with financial authority in the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs at the recipient‘s institution.
Publications, presentations and abstracts
Electronic copies of publications, presentations and abstracts that report research supported by funds from the Alzheimer‘s Association must be submitted electronically at the time of publication. These copies will become part of the official file of the grant and will be provided to the Communications Division of the Alzheimer‘s Association to assist in the efforts to further inform the public about the International Research Grant Program of the Association.
Recruitment efforts for clinical studies
Projects involving human subjects must address the appropriate inclusion or exclusion of individuals in the proposed research project and describe recruitment efforts to represent the community in which the study is planned or being conducted. Prior to distribution of funding, the researcher must provide a description of their recruitment plan, including an outline describing how their recruitment efforts will ensure diversity in their participants. Recruitment efforts should focus on diversity within key target groups, including a diverse representation of (but not limited to): sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, race and ethnicity. This will be tracked throughout the duration of the grant.
Checks are awarded to the institution, not to the individual principal investigator. The principal investigator or a first degree relative cannot be listed as the signing official or financial officer, or have checks sent to their attention if awarded.
Multiple and overlapping submissions
If an applicant submits proposals to different grant competitions in the same grant cycle, each proposal submitted must address a distinctly different topic. Only one proposal will be funded if scores for multiple submissions fall within the funding range of different grant competitions. Applicants cannot submit more than one proposal in the same grant competition — even if the proposals cover distinctly different topics.
Applicants may revise and resubmit an application that was previously submitted for an earlier grant cycle; however, a new LOI is required each year. A current LOI corresponding to the application year must accompany each application. Revisions of previous submissions will be treated as new applications; however, efforts will be made to provide some continuity in reviews. Resubmission of an LOI does not guarantee that you will be invited to submit a full application in a future cycle.
Review process overview
All proposals are subject to a multi-stage peer-review process carried out through an online system. In the first stage, applications are reviewed and rated by a minimum of three peer scientists with expertise in the proposed area of research; Zenith Fellows applications are reviewed by previously awarded Zenith Fellows. Applicants may include recommended reviewers and also have the option to exclude specific reviewers from evaluating their application if a conflict of interest exists. Conflicts of interest include (but are not limited to):
- The Applicant trained with/or by the reviewer.
- The Reviewer published with the Applicant in the last four (4) years. This excludes workshops or large consortia (i.e. ADNI, IGAP, etc).
- The Reviewer has been a co-investigator on a grant application or award with the Applicant in the last four (4) years.
- Reviewer has a conceptual difference of opinion with the Applicant that will prevent a fair review.
- Reviewer will receive financial benefit from the Applicant receiving an award.
The second stage includes further review and discussion of the scores and comments resulting from the initial review process. This second review is carried out by the International Research Grant Program (IRGP) Council and invited review committee members, who also are past or active Zenith Fellows, to ensure fairness and equity in the initial review procedures and to make funding recommendations to the Association. Final recommendations from the IRGP Council are shared with the Medical and Scientific Advisory Group (MSAG) and with the Alzheimer’s Association for final approval. Members of the IRGP Council and MSAG are internationally recognized experts with distinguished careers in Alzheimer's and all dementias.
The Zenith Fellows Award includes an extra level of review that engages the Alzheimer’s Association Zenith Society to select final award recipients based on project topics in which they are most interested. Many of the Zenith Society members have family and friends affected by Alzheimer’s and all other dementia and have a deep commitment to advancing the research.
This multi-stage process is central to our award decisions and is designed to ensure both scientific rigor and fairness in the review of all submitted applications.
Appeals of scientific peer-review
To maintain a fair and rigorous review system, the Alzheimer’s Association has established a process for appeal of funding decisions. An appeal is intended to address extraordinary circumstances. Appropriate reasons for initiating an appeal might include:
- Evidence that a reviewer has an undeclared conflict of interest.
- An egregious error or misunderstanding in the review process.
- Active malfeasance or demonstrable lack of due diligence.
The appeal process is not intended to provide a mechanism for routine protest of failure to receive a grant. Disparities in peer reviewers’ enthusiasm for a proposal and the scores they assign are nearly always considered part of the normal variation in human judgment. The reality is that the Alzheimer’s Association International Research Grant Program is extremely competitive and is limited by availability of funds. In recent grant cycles, 10 to 15 percent of full applications have been awarded grants, although about twice that number fall into the “fundable” category based on overall score.
If an applicant believes an extraordinary circumstance has contributed to failure to receive funding, the principal investigator may send a two-page, double-spaced formal letter of appeal (Word document) to firstname.lastname@example.org. Any supporting documents included must be submitted as a PDF. Appeals must be submitted within two weeks from the date your application outcome notification is sent. Notification of action on the appeal will be made via email, usually within 90 days of the appeal deadline.
Nondiscrimination and harassment statement
The Alzheimer’s Association is committed to providing an environment free from harassment and discrimination. The Alzheimer’s Association strictly prohibits harassment and discrimination based race; creed; color; religion; sex; sexual orientation; national origin; ancestry; age; veteran status; citizenship status; marital status; physical or mental disabilities; pregnancy, gender identity or expression (including transgender status); genetic information; and any other characteristic protected by federal, state or local law.
For more information: Contact email@example.com.